Montana gets its EHR money back

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="175" caption="Gov. Brian Schweitzer (D-Mont.)"]Gov. Brian Schweitzer (D-Mont.)[/caption]

HELENA, MT – The Montana Senate voted to restore the $35 million in federal incentives for electronic medical records for hospitals and community health centers across the state this week.

The Montana legislature initially denied the state's Department of Health and Humans Services (DPHHS) the authority to accept and distribute the money to hospitals four times on party-line votes – making it the only state to do so.

But, under pressure from Gov. Brian Schweitzer (D-Mont.) and healthcare providers from across the state, the Senate voted 45-5 for the motion on March 28.

Earlier this month Schweitzer warned lawmakers that they were increasing the cost and lowering the quality of healthcare in Montana by refusing funding for electronic health records technology.

The state has 47 critical access hospitals in smaller communities across the state, and almost all will likely qualify for the funding, according to the governor.

"Electronic health record systems save money and improve care through eliminating the need for duplicative testing," Schweitzer said.

Click here to see votes on the HIT funding.

This article was originally posted at http://ping.fm/xZ0vB

Apple?s iPad: Is it a perfect e-learning tool?

Apple’s iPad has been a pathbreaker of sorts in the technological field. They were many naysayers during its launch regarding its utility, but I suppose the tremendous success of the product have shut up their mouths. The craze and euphoria has not died yet, and with the launch of iPad 2, the buzz is getting stronger. And the all-important question comes to the fore: can the iPad serve as an ideal classroom teaching device?


I strongly feel that iPad will have a part to do. It is sure to displace one-to-many teaching pedagogies in favor of interactive one-to-one studying and learning and will encourage much more participation from students.


To drive home my point about the iPad will have a role in online education for children, here is some news. It has been seen by many that those children who haven’t learned to read or write or even operate a mouse are able to operate the iPad with tremendous speed. According to an article published in Ad Age in June 2010, “How the iPad Became Child’s Play – and Learning Tool,” there were many toddlers as who were as many as 18 months old only who were trying to provoke interaction from TV sets and PC monitors as if they were touch screens like that of the iPad. This indicates clearly that the next generation will find it very easy to respond well and interact with the intuitive device.



In another study related to e-book reading, a survey result released by Student Monitor revealed that out of 1200 college students who were participants in the survey and interested in e-readers, more than 46% of them opted for iPad as the preferred e-reader rather than 38% of them who favored Amazon’s Kindle. This indicates that iPad is known among the adolescents to be much more conducive and intuitive than the Kindle.


Educators today are stressing on the need for contextual learning and user participation. Digital whiteboards have failed to encourage interactivity, and is also less on computing power. The laptop is comparatively bulky too and can be problematic to handle sometimes. The iPad then serves to be the perfect device for comfortable online learning and acts as a useful tool for referencing, collaborating, and content creation. The best part is that of the choice for personalized content for students.


Some of the kinks are there: it does not support web pages which have Flash, it does not have a telephone, it does not have a camera and it also does not have USB slots or memory card slots although there is support for dongles. These limitations are somewhat deterrent for its use but once there are updates to the device, I don’t really see a problem for the iPad to be used as a e-learning device!


About emPower

emPower  is a leading provider of comprehensive Healthcare Compliance Solutions through Learning Management System (LMS). Its mission is to provide innovative security solutions to enable compliance with applicable laws and regulations and maximize business performance. empower provides range of courses to manage compliance required by regulatory bodies such as OSHA, HIPAA, Joint commission and Red Flag Rule etc. Apart from this emPower also offers custom demos and tutorials for your website, business process management and software implementation.



Its Learning Management system (LMS) allows students to retrieve all the courses 24/7/365 by accessing the portal. emPower e-learning training program is an interactive mode of learning that guides students to progress at their own pace.


For additional information, please visit http://www.empowerbpo.com .

Bainbridge HomeShare program fills a need for affordable housing

By Tristan Baurick

Kitsap Sun
BAINBRIDGE ISLAND — A Bainbridge affordable-housing group wants homeowners to rethink a housing arrangement they likely abandoned in college.

Taking on a roommate benefits both owner and renter — especially during hard economic times, according to the Housing Resources Board (HRB), which manages the county's only roommate-matching program.
HRB program specialist Penny Lamping said a roommate can help cover a mortgage, provide companionship and chip in on house chores. In return, the homeowner provides below-market-rate housing for a person hit by hard times.

"Some people take a roommate because they have a big house to themselves and they want to share," Lamping said. "Some do it to exercise a social consciousness."

HRB's roommate-matching program, called HomeShare, was created two years ago, but it's getting renewed emphasis as the gap widens between the typical rental rate and the amount people can afford.
"We're getting phone calls all the time, but they can only afford $200 to $500 (per month)," said HRB Executive Director Ken Balizer.

Even the homes HRB manages are typically beyond that range.
HRB is also trying to boost the HomeShare program because the city greatly reduced its financial support, making it difficult for HRB to build new homes or lower the rent on existing ones.

HRB conducts background checks on rental applicants and matches them with homeowners, thereby streamlining and easing the search process for both parties.

Bainbridge homeowner Holly Hall has been renting a room to a young woman for the last 15 months.
"I lived by myself and really wasn't using half my house, so I thought it was worth a try," she said. "It's really worked out well so far."

Until recently, HRB board member Kim Hendrickson rented a room to a Peruvian woman. The arrangement took some financial pressure off Hendrickson's family and gave her kids an early introduction to Spanish, she said.
Hall said opening one's home to a renter isn't without sacrifices. Sometimes chores go undone, and a previous renter had trouble paying the rent during a family emergency.

"You have to be clear and articulate in terms of rent and house cleaning," she said.

Some renters do maintenance, pet watching or provide in-home care for elderly homeowners to supplement rent.
HRB has a list of nearly 20 people seeking homes through the HomeShare program. The list of homeowners offering a room is nearly as long, but HRB is having trouble finding homeowners who will go lower than $600.
Hall said the monthly income is nice, but she doesn't expect it to make her rich.
"It's not about the income," she said. "It's about doing something good for somebody else."

Rent Watch: Landlord can require permission for roommate

Question: I have rented a three-bedroom unit for two years. About eight months ago, I lost my job and could no longer pay my rent. Rather than be evicted, I found a roommate who now pays half the monthly rent.
From the beginning, my roommate has written a separate check for his half of the monthly rent and I write my own check for the other half. I give both checks to the rental office, which is the place designated for payment in my rental agreement.

When I took the two checks to the office last week, the new resident manager told me she would not accept the checks. She said I was in violation of my rental agreement. She showed me a copy of the agreement, which does prohibit subletting without management's written permission. Is there anything I can do?
Answer: A landlord has the right to prohibit subletting or require advance written consent. If the management wants to enforce this clause, you could be given a three-day notice to remove your roommate or face an unlawful detainer action for eviction.

You have one potential defense to the assertion that you are in violation of the rental agreement. If you can show that the community's management allowed the roommate to occupy your unit and did not take timely action to require the roommate to vacate, you can assert that management's inaction constituted a waiver of its right to enforce the clause prohibiting sublets. Knowingly accepting a rent check from your roommate over a period of months is strong evidence of waiver.

Even if you have a strong defense, fighting an unlawful detainer can be costly in terms of time and money. If the court rejects the defense, you will have an eviction on your record, which will seriously limit your ability to rent in the future.

As an alternative, you could contact your local mediation program to see whether a resolution can be reached. For example, you and your roommate could reach an agreement to add the roommate to the rental agreement or you could negotiate an agreement allowing you or the roommate a reasonable time to vacate.
Eichner is director of Housing Counseling Programs for Project Sentinel, a Sunnyvale, Calif., mediation service. To submit a question, go to http://www.housing.org.

Which OSHA Regulations Require Written Plans?






If OSHA Compliance came to your door, what’s one of the first things the inspector might ask to see? The answer is . . . your Hazard Communication Plan. Is your written plan up for that kind of scrutiny? How about your other safety and health plans? Are you sure you have all the required written plans you need in place?

Not all OSHA regulations require written plans, but many do. The question is which ones? Take a look at the bulleted list of general industry regulations requiring written plans. For your convenience, we’ve put them in order from most-violated down to least-violated plans, according to the latest OSHA statistics:


*  Hazard communication – 1910.1200(e)
*  Lockout/tagout (energy control procedures)- 1910.147(c)(4)
*  Respiratory protection – 1910.134(c)(1)
*  Process safety management – 1910.119(d),(e)(1),(f)(1),(j)(1),(l)(1),(m)(4),(o)(3)
*  Personal protective equipment (hazard assessment) – 1910.132(d)
*  Bloodborne pathogens – 1910.1030(c)
*  Emergency action plans – 1910.38(b)
*  Permit-required confined spaces – 1910.146(c)(4)
*  Hazardous waste operations and emergency response – 1910.120(b)(1),(l)(1),(p)(1),(q)(1)
*  Electrical safety (assured equipment grounding conductor program and lockout/tagout procedures for work with energized parts) – 1910.304(b)(3)(ii) and 1910.333(b)(2)(i)
*  Fire prevention plans – 1910.39(b)
*  Laboratory standard (chemical hygiene plan) – 1910.1450(e)
*  Commercial diving operations (safe practices manual) – 1910.420
*  Powered platforms for building maintenance (emergency action plan) – 1910.66(e)(9)


    When OSHA considers a safety or health hazard to be serious, the agency usually requires written documentation of the steps an employer takes to counteract the hazard. You can see that the above list covers some of the most serious hazards faced by workers today, including, but not limited to, chemical exposures, process explosions, fire, electrocution, and bloodborne pathogens.

    As an employer, not all of these plans will necessarily be applicable to your workplace, so you’ll want to review the scope and applicability of these regulations to see if your company falls under any of them. For the applicable ones, make sure your written plans meet all the OSHA-required elements specified in the regulations.

    This article was originally posted at http://ping.fm/TtYUH

    Does a New EHR Mean Switching Practice Management Systems?



    Four years ago, pediatrician Jeffrey T. VanGelderen and his partner at the Children's Medical Group of Saginaw Bay in Michigan were looking for an EHR for their practice. Before shopping, they had a difficult decision to make: Find an EHR compatible with their current practice management system or buy an EHR and at the same time, buy a new management system designed to work with it.

    In an effort to increase compatibility between the two systems, VanGelderen and his partner chose the latter option, going with brand new systems. They first investigated the EHR offering from their management system vendor, and found it user-friendly, but not as robust as the newer software from another company.

    "In a lot of cases like ours, practices already have a management system in place and have had it there for a long time," he says. "When you make the decision to go to an EHR and fully integrate it, you usually go to another [management system]."

    In 2008, Children's Medical Group debuted its new practice management system and less than nine months later, had its EHR online with the two systems working collaboratively together.
    VanGelderen says the result has been great. The cost of the two new systems already has been more than made up for, he says, and in fact, the new systems have freed up staff time through better efficiencies in the software.

    "We are using that time for better quality of care, like follow-ups and identifying patients who need well checks, and our nurses are doing more patient education versus paper shuffling," he says.

    If you are considering implementing an EHR at your practice and want one that works with your current management system, how much of an investment should you make? Our experts weigh in with two trains of thought.

    Assess your needs

    You wouldn't make a big capital investment in a medical device without a little research on cost, use at your practice, and training, right? Well, our experts say when it comes to weighing a potential relationship between your practice management system and an EHR you also need to do your homework.

    Fred Pennic, a healthcare IT consultant and technology blogger, says if you like your current practice management system, make a complete assessment of what it will mean to bring an EHR online also. This includes ensuring you have the proper resources to support it, in terms of IT staff or other employees, knowing what your licensing agreement will cost you, and estimating training hours required to get any new system up and running.

    You also need to weigh the pros and cons for your practice, adds Don Sickle, a former EHR specialist with national consulting firm Welch Allyn. Sure your current system is all paid off and familiar to staff, but does it also have lingering problems that require tricks and shortcuts by your staff — costing time and money just to get it to work? If so, perhaps it is time for an upgrade, Sickle says.

    If you are ready for an EHR, both Pennic and Sickle advise taking the same first step as Children's Medical Group — call your current practice management system vendor to inquire about its EHR offering. If you are happy with one of the vendor’s products, you may like a companion that works similarly and is more likely integrated than two systems from two different vendors.

    Sickle, who was also president of advisory firm EHRInsider, says two different vendors means more "interfaces" between products so they can communicate, which isn't always a good thing.

    "Interfaces are all links in a chain, and eventually, one of them will be weak somewhere at some point," he says. "The key is to have as few links in this technological chain as possible."

    When calling your existing practice management system vendor to inquire about its EHR offering, Sickle advises inquiring how long the vendor has had the product in place and whether the EHR was purchased from an out-of-business company — making it less likely to work seamlessly with your practice management system. Just because it is from the same vendor doesn't mean the systems will work together in perfect harmony.

    If the vendor does have a product you are happy with, schedule a Web demo, Sickle says, or even an onsite visit to your practice so you can learn more about the EHR and how it will fit into your practice's current operations.

    Time for a change

    But what if, during that assessment, you find that your current practice management system is not as efficient as when you bought it years ago? Then it may be time for a change.

    Margret Amatayukul, president of Margret/A Consulting in Schaumburg, Ill., says when it comes to getting practice management systems and EHRs to work together, the answer is simple:

    "You cannot find an EHR today worth its salt that will really integrate well with an old practice management system," she says.

    So practices hoping for harmonious integration between an EHR and practice management system should at least consider buying both products new, she says.

    "You should not be closed-minded about being open to looking into a new practice management component that makes sense for you," Amatayukul says. "Keep an open mind, even if you are dead set against it."

    Now that you are ready to shop for some technology, try to hit as many EHR vendors as possible. Where is the best place to do that? Trade shows, says Sickle. Check for local and national trade shows where multiple vendors will talk to you and provide you with lots of literature on their products.

    Take the 10 to 20 in-person visits and make a shorter list of vendors, about five or six, and set up Web-based demos for you and some of your key staff. From there, choose the two or three you want to do an in-depth demo that will include how the practice management and EHR components work together effectively.

    Learn from others

    More likely than not, you are not the first practice to make a big investment in a new practice management system and EHR at the same time. So to best gauge how your new products will work together, talk to those who've already done it, say our experts.

    Get references directly from your potential new vendor partner, Amatayukul says, and be specific — ask for a similar-size practice making the same decisions you are.

    "Don't take 'we've done a lot of these' as an answer from a vendor," she says. "They need to dig deep in terms of how many have you done on my version [of the system] and in the same size and type of practice I am. …Vendors often have references for EHRs, but don't get references for [management system] conversion. If the vendor can't come up with a reference exactly like yours, steer clear because they don't have the experience."

    VanGelderen agrees, saying it is very important to see demos, but also talk to other practices.

    "I have several colleagues in the medical field who opted for one system or another simply because it was more compatible with what they had," he says. "But often times, that doesn't work well if you don't have a good system. You want to be sure the system has everything to offer and the flexibility you need for your practice."

    Again, just because the systems can talk to each other doesn't mean they are always the best fit, VanGelderen warns. He recalls a neighboring practice that placed compatibility over function and as a result, did not get the most from its EHR.

    "You don't just want to pick something because it is an easier fit with your management system," he says. "You may lose [capabilities] on the EHR side, which is why you are making the switch in the first place."

    Where do you want to go?

    Marlin Moyer, program director for information technology with Pennsylvania-based Geisinger Health System, also warns small- and mid-size practices against just looking at an EHR without even considering the impact on their current practice management system.

    He says going with a non-integrated system means your practice has to have the manpower in your office or the money for consultants to get those two systems talking and working together, "and that goes with significant maintenance."

    At a minimum, Moyer says, get the "front end" of your management system — like scheduling, patient registration, follow-up appointments — synched to your EHR and you can live with a separate billing system.

    Geisinger, which employs more than 800 physicians in 42 Pennsylvania counties, developed its own EHR in the mid-1990s to work with its in-house management system. An important part of the system's work was to adapt its operations to the EHR and not vice versa.

    "Practices try to make the technology work with their current work flow versus looking at the bigger picture," Moyer says. "Look at what you want … with a combined EHR and management system. Are you looking to just get something that meets 'meaningful use' guidelines or to transform your practice, become more innovative, and take things to the next level? It's looking at where you want to be in 20 years, not 'do I want to get the incentives offered right now.'"

    This article was originally posted at http://ping.fm/7lTJf

    Hospital chief pleads guilty in case over firing of Texas nurses

    Stan Wiley, former hospital administrator of Winkler County Memorial Hospital, Kermit Texas, pleaded guilty to abuse of official capacity for his role in the firing of two nurses who had complained about a doctor to the Texas Medical Board, according to the Texas attorney general's office.

    Wiley was sentenced to 30 days in the Winkler County Jail by visiting Judge Robert H. Moore III as part of a plea deal in which he has agreed to cooperate in the prosecution of three other defendants, according to a news release from the attorney general’s office, which is prosecuting the case because the Winkler County District Attorney recused himself from the proceedings.

    Also being prosecuted are former Winkler County Memorial Hospital physician Dr. Rolando Arafiles, Winkler County Sheriff Robert Roberts and Winkler County Attorney Scott Tidwell. Arafiles recently was fined $5,000, publicly reprimanded and required to undergo training and oversight by the state medical board .

    Wiley, Arafiles, Roberts and Tidwell were indicted in January for allegedly retaliating against two nurses who had reported Arafiles to the state medical board in 2009 for actions they believed were endangering hospital patients.

    The two nurses, Anne Mitchell and Vickilyn Galle, settled with Winkler County for $750,000 in August, according to their attorneys.

    This article was originally posted at http://ping.fm/xdFhr

    Study: Many Physicians Eligible for Incentives but Lack EHRs

    Many physicians are eligible for federal incentive payments for the meaningful use of electronic health records but lack a basic EHR system, according to a study published in the journal Health Affairs, Healthcare IT News reports.



    Under the 2009 economic stimulus package, health care providers who demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHRs can qualify for incentive payments through Medicare and Medicaid. Eligibility for the incentive payment programs is based on the number of Medicare and Medicaid patients seen.

    For the study, researchers used data from the 2007 and 2008 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to gauge EHR use by nonfederal, office-based physicians (Merrill, Healthcare IT News, 3/8).

    Key Findings

    Overall, researchers found that nearly 83% of office-based physicians are eligible for either the Medicare or Medicaid incentive program. They noted that:
    • About 76% of physicians could qualify for the Medicare incentive program; and
    • About 15% could qualify for the Medicaid incentive program.
    Physicians must choose to participate in either the Medicare or the Medicaid incentive program. Because the Medicaid program likely would offer higher incentive payments, researchers assumed that most physicians eligible for the Medicaid program would pursue it (Conn, Modern Healthcare, 3/8).

    The study also found that:
    • 70.5% of physicians are eligible for either the Medicare or Medicaid incentives, but do not have a basic EHR system;
    • 14.6% of physicians are not eligible for incentives and do not have a basic EHR;
    • 12.1% of physicians are eligible for incentives and have a basic EHR; and
    • 2.8% of physicians are not eligible for incentives and have a basic EHR system (Healthcare IT News, 3/8).
    In addition, researchers found that eligibility for the EHR incentive programs varied by medical specialty. For example, 91% of general practice, internal medicine and family practice specialists are eligible for incentives, compared with 53% of pediatricians.

    Recommendations

    Researchers recommended that policymakers broaden eligibility requirements for the incentive payments to help more specialists qualify for the programs (Modern Healthcare, 3/8).

    The study authors wrote that "if after the HITECH incentives have been implemented, research reveals that physicians still are not generally using EHRs and that further incentives would lead to commensurate gains in the quality and efficiency of care, there would be stronger basis for recommending changes in the incentive structure" (Healthcare IT News, 3/8).